Rationale: In recent years, the cost of several treatment options for renal cancer have been supported by the Romanian healthcare system for both first- and second-line therapies. First-line alternatives through real-life efficacy and amplitude of adverse reactions may influence the efficacy and costs of patients treated with second-line treatment.

Objective: Estimation of the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit ratio for first-line treatment alternatives: Sunitinib and Pazopanib from the payer’s perspective in the Romanian healthcare system.

Methods and Results: We developed a Markov model to calculate the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit ratio for 2 cohorts of patients using the results from the COMPARZ study for efficacy (progression-free survival, general survivability and quality of life) and safety and costs from national hospital databases. For an estimated population of 800 patients, Pazopanib has a quantified benefit of 7.19 years in progression-free survival, 11.71 life years gained and 8.97 years of quality-adjusted life-years compared to Sunitinib. The analysis is limited by the accuracy of the national data used and the transposition of general data on efficacy and safety at the local level.